Sun 16 Jan, 2005
|
|
|
|
Canada: Strength and not skills is new emphasis of modern hockey x18
 |
| Canada |
January 9, 2005
The Star Online
> Page Views 907
By S. RAMAGURU
For more than two decades Kenya-born Shiaz Virjee has been a major influence in the Canadian hockey team, earning himself a name as a coach alongside big names like German Paul Lissek and Australian Terry Walsh. Shiaz, a FIH high-performance coach, is in Malaysia with the University of British Columbia team. STARSPORTS S. RAMAGURU catches up with him.
KUALA LUMPUR: Canadian coach Shiaz Virjee has one word to describe the direction in which world hockey is going power.
India and Pakistan once used to rule hockey with their silken skills but that has now taken a back seat as top teams have mastered the art of using power to their advantage. Shiaz feels that unless the other teams are willing to change, teams like Germany, Holland, Spain and Australia will maintain their grip on the sport.
These teams have mastered the basic techniques like hitting, pushing and flicking to such an extent that they can now do it with such ease and have all the power to back them up. Their play is simple and does not require the great amount of skills that the Indians or Pakistanis possess.
SHIAZ: Questions the constant rule changes
This power game has enabled them to reach the top and stay there as there is very little you can do when teams are so proficient and clinical in the way they play. They allow no room for mistakes.
I firmly believe that if teams like India, Pakistan, Malaysia or for the matter Canada want to break through at the top, then your game must evolve in the way it has with these top teams, he said.
The Kenya-born coach, however, said that although the elite teams would remain at the top of the pile, new teams will be fighting to break into the top dozen in the world.
China, he said, were a good example of a team who would be challenging for places among the top six by 2008. they will be able to challenge for a place in the top six category. He also said that Egypt who will host the Champions Challenge later this year is also another team which is making waves again.
For me, it is exciting to see China emerging as a force. I feel they will be the team to beat by 2008. They have started to go out and play and mark my words: by next year, teams will be clamouring to play them so they can learn more about the Chinese.
They are like another South Korea and will soon be a regular competitor in the world scene. The signs are there. The teams outside the big four will have to take note, he said.
Shiaz has been all over the world and led the Canadian team to most of the top tournaments, except the Champions Trophy. Since he gave up coaching the national team in 2000 after the Sydney Olympics, Shiaz has decided to go back to his regular work and do age-group development. His son, Arif, who is 13, is also involved in the game in age-group competitions.
His present full-time job is as a manager, purchasing and strategic sourcing for a company providing business services for utilities.
Shiaz said he had felt that the time was right for him to quit international hockey after the Sydney Olympics.
I wanted to pick my time to quit the national team and not wait till I am told to go. That is why a year before the Sydney Olympics, I told the association of my intentions no matter what the results at the 2000 Games.
Im not saying that I will not coach a national team again. I'll never say no to any coaching task. But if there is an opportunity to take charge of a national team in future then I will have to look at the option positively.
For the moment, I am enjoying my role in junior development. I also have a lot of coaching courses to keep me busy overseas under the FIH banner. So, in many ways, Im still very much involved in hockey but in a different capacity. It is just that you do not have to deal with the pressures of being a national coach. It is more relaxed now, he added.
Shiaz also said he was not in favour of the continuing rule-changes, some of which he felt were not necessary at all.
I believe the game has become more dangerous now with all the constant rule changes. I do not for one moment think that these rules have attracted new spectators to the game. There is a lot more confusion in the interpretation of the rules as compared to 10 or 15 years ago. I would like to ask: Why change the rules which have worked before? What is the need for changes if they do not bring about new interest from the people?
Let us not change for the sake of changing.
Shaiz was also against the introduction of composite sticks.
What the composite stick has done is to help the power game. They help you hit the ball faster and harder and you do not need any other skills for it.
The wooden stick has been a proven equipment and again you wonder why there is a need to bring in a new stick which costs a lot of money.
Are we making the game more accessible to the lower-end groups and children? They cannot afford such a stick. Sure, the national players can use it. They will get it sponsored. But players who train with a wooden stick will face a disadvantage when they go up against those with the new sticks, he said.
On Malaysia, Shiaz said the country had one of the most complete facilities in the world but had to learn to evolve in the game.
Malaysia have some very exciting talents and can be a force again. They need to make some changes to their game along the lines of the present top sides. Im glad to see that local coaches are being given the task of moulding the national team.
But the most important thing is that you need to keep changing with the times, he said.

Your opinion counts. Rate this article or enter your comments below.
|
Opinions expressed here do not represent the official views of PlanetFieldHockey.com or its staff. Comments will be removed if they are considered offensive or of a personal nature.
Comments on this article
|
Sanjeev
01-10-2005 9:46 pm
|
Report this post
|
Ironic
First he was against the constant rules changes, at the end he's asking to keep changing with the times..
|
|
kuchnai
01-11-2005 10:27 am
|
Report this post
|
We hear this a lot...
The last generation seems to have a problem with the way the game has moved on. The fact is that athletes are better, surfaces are faster and equipment generates more pace-just like every other sport I can think of. The problem is that there are Asian teams which have adapted and evloved such as Korea and there are those which have not. If you're telling me that Messrs. Escarre, Dwyer, Reinelt, Brouwer, Klaver are all power and no skill then you are not living in the real world. They are all slight/athletic and in some cases even short guys who have a full range of skills including deception and elimination moves which involve moving the ball a long way and in the right area of the field. Also non Asian teams are not hung up with players' pecking orders with so called 'juniors' getting field time if they are good enough. The key is a point that he does make( power is a red herring although I think some guys could definitely put themselves in better shape to play) which is that the top teams make very few mistakes which is due to a competetive domestic league (not umpired too softly), good, structured coaching, good facilities and a willingness to work a 2-4 year plan with the same coach.
|
|
JFK
01-11-2005 7:20 pm
|
Report this post
|
Skill
Shiaz does not know what he talks about...
The game is faster but there is definitely a lot of skill around and its not just the ones who hit the ball hardest who succeed. Today's athlete is also sharper when it comes to receiving and moving the ball onto a team-mate or into space.
The successful teams balance things out whereas some teams either just rely on power or just on skill and no smarts.
Shiaz should watch more hockey before commenting.
|
|
trendy
01-12-2005 7:29 am
|
Report this post
|
shiaz
he pointed out right! u guys missed it all.... if u watched Ger or spain palying in olympics ,they just hitting long accurate passes thats all ,i didnt see any stick work or body dodges.............2 goals agianst Pakistan by spain was a long pass from center line and the other guy was almost on the boundry line (as no oofside rule is) and he simply dodged the goal keeper and scored! also keep in mind that weather conditions in europe favours artificial surface ! thats why all those countries like ger,holland,spain are very well physically fit.........
|
|
|
|
z
01-12-2005 8:51 am
|
Report this post
|
physically fit?
What does artificial surface have to do with being physically fit?
|
|
re. Trendy
01-12-2005 10:43 pm
|
Report this post
|
doesn't make sense
I agree with Z, how does the surface that certain teams train on explain why they are physically fit. And one more thing, you said that you did not see any any body dodges or stick work...than in the next line you stated that the goal scorer simply dodged the keep and scored! Is that not the whole point of using a dodge and what better time to use it while scoring a goal. So you think that the Germans, the Dutch and the Spanish are strong and all power, why are teams such as Korea and China becoming much better in the world rankings?? It is not just based on power, obviously the strong european teams are not just power, this game requires an extraordinary amount of skill to be successful, you are the best because you are the best in most of the fields required to be the best, ie. physical strength, mental strength, basic and advanced skils as well as a solid coach. These are required to build a championship team. I think that Shiaz has a few points, but not a totally sound argument. About the composite stick issue...it is like every other sport in the world, basketball, baseball, ice hockey. If there is a market to sell more expensive equipment than the companies will feed the market, and for those that can not afford the more expensive stick will settle with a wood one and since our game is not all hitting the long ball...much less hitting in the game now a days than 10 to 15 years ago, the sweep/slap whatever you want to call it is used much more and the drive. Maybe teams like India and Pakistan that used to use their "silken" smooth skills to dominate need to change with the game and get faster and stronger and learn from the Europeans, they must be doing something right.
|
|
the watcher
01-13-2005 2:22 pm
|
Report this post
|
|
i think that in reading this everybody should remember that this was an interview, not an article written by shiaz...surely there was some things left out, and the interview was conducted in malaysia so there may have been a bit of a language barrier in getting his points across.....all in all pretty much everything shiaz talks about is right, he doesn't say that indian style stick skills are obsolete, he never would say that because their not, but other teams are reaching news hights by increasing other skills and creating a technically sound and advanced game, while having forwards and mids who are capable of shaking defenders left and right.....and after all the guy does know more about the game than anybody commenting on this thread i'm sure
|
|
Hockey Nut
01-13-2005 4:41 pm
|
Report this post
|
|
Maybe we should get the opinions of the real coaches in Sydney: Peter, Ian and Toon.
|
|
aussie
01-13-2005 6:23 pm
|
Report this post
|
Shiaz
Hockey Nut
i think you will find that shiaz is a REAL COACH, anybody who casn take the Canadian me to 8th in the world prior to the syd olympics has done very well, where are they now withjout him, 20th or where ever down that far it doesnt realy matter.
|
|
comrade
01-13-2005 8:42 pm
|
Report this post
|
hockey
Shiaz coached the team for 6 years...took canada to the world cup (8th), Won the Pan Ams (gold) and took Canada to the Olympics, Coached World 11 team vs Dutch
Gene- 5 years........nothing!
enough said!
Time for a New coach
|
|
Canuck
01-13-2005 9:01 pm
|
Report this post
|
Shiaz did not coach the Canadian team
Hockey Nut like myself knows the truth. As he said earlier, bird, milko and toon coached the olympic team and burrows directed the team before that upto the 98 world cup. Shiaz organized the program whcih he did very well but it is wrong that he gets and takes credit for the coaching of the team. Shiaz is a good manager and that's it.
|
|
Hockey Nut
01-14-2005 2:07 pm
|
Report this post
|
aussie - see Fiasco
Anyone who knew the real inner workings of the team will agree with Canuck as well. The results were very good, but give credit where it's due for coaching, not managing. Even on the managing end, so much was given to that 2000 group that there was not much left for Gene, let alone anyone else. Doubt if Shiaz could have continued the pace with what was left after Sidney. That's why he gave his notice a year in advance, he could see the future as well.
|
|
Curious
01-14-2005 2:09 pm
|
Report this post
|
Player
Did Shiaz ever play hockey? What level? Just wondering!
|
|
Disc Stu
01-14-2005 6:24 pm
|
Report this post
|
Disch Music
Dear "hockey nut.' The reason that there was nothing left after Shiaz left b/c FHC in the infinite wisdom did not plan and hire a new coach knowing that Shiaz was to retire at the end of the Olympics. The program was set up brilliantly by a masterful coach and was torn down by lack of leadership and initiative by FHC. I feel sorry for John Sacre as he was thrown a team months before the Commonwealth Games and was told to qualify the team for the World Cup. What was FHC thinking?
Lets move the discussion to current leadership. It has now been over 1 year since FCH had a Womens coach. Is this how to build a program? I am by no means an expert, but I would have to say no.
|
|
Peter D'Cruz
01-14-2005 10:23 pm
|
Report this post
|
What happened in 2000
One benefit of PFH is that those of us who were directly involved can set the record straight for those who have a third party or unsubstantiated opinion.
Shiaz and the FHC board were complicit and share the blame for spending all the program dollars for the mens national team for the 2000-2001 fiscal year on the team in preparation for Sydney. All the money was gone by early September 2000 and govt. funds would not be available until after April 2001. What did spending all the money in the mens budget for 2000-2001 accomplish by the team in Sydney? A tenth place finish which was no better than the 1976, 1984 and 1988 Canadian Olympic teams.
There was no money available for the mens team to prepare a team for the 2001 WCC qualifier in Scotland from October 2000 to April 2001 other than to hold practices in Vancouver. On top of that, FHCs board did not act decisively to replace Shiaz as he had given his notice well in advance of the Olympics. Such dithering by FHCs board was damaging to the mens program then and is just as damaging now with regards our womens national team program which has been without a coach for well over a year. The process to hire a new mens national team coach after Sydney did not begin until Reg Plummers committee was formed and began its work to hire a full-time coach in January 2001, five months after the Olympics were completed!!!
|
|
Peter D'Cruz
01-14-2005 10:28 pm
|
Report this post
|
Judging the Shiaz mens national team program
Comments have been expressed that the mens team during Shiazs tenure was coached by certain leading players. This can only be corroborated by either Shiaz or the players involved from that period so it will remain a controversy.
I consider that the measure of the success of the mens program during the Shiaz coached period is the both results and legacy. By 2000, the team was an older group that would have a large number of retirements after Sydney. Was it the right decision to not introduce a next generation of players to the team after it finished 8th in the World Cup in 1998 and especially after the team qualified for Sydney at the Pan Ams in 1999? The results say that this was wrong as the team in Sydney slipped in its world ranking to 10th from 8th two years earlier.
From a legacy perspective, the genuine failure of the program by 2000 is that this experienced team did not beat low ranked Cuba in the early summer of 2000 in the Americas Cup which was a leading indicator that the team would not do well in Sydney. But, this forgotten failure at the Americas Cup cost the mens national team program a berth in the 2002 World Cup which wouldve allowed the next coach time to rebuild the team after all the retirements after Sydney.
So, the results in 2000 at the end of Shiazs tenure as national coach was a loss against Cuba in the Americas Cup final which deprived Canada a World Cup berth, a 10th place finish at Sydney, no money available to the mens team program from September 2000 to April 2001 and a lack of foresight to prepare a next generation of players that could do well for Canada.
People will surely disagree with my comments, but I am expressing the facts, i.e., the results of the team in 2000 and the choice made to stick with an older group of athletes which did not pan out in getting Canada to the next level in its world rankings.
|
|
Tom Harris
01-15-2005 9:11 pm
|
Report this post
|
Curious Comment
The question from Curious about where or at what level Shiaz played is irrelevant to this discussion.
Many coaches in many sports played very little at a high level and yet achieved great coaching success. The opposite is also true.
|
|
|
|
 |
HOME | FEATURES | CLUBHOUSE | CAMPS | LINKS | ABOUT US | STORE | ADVERTISE
Use of this site is subject to certain Terms & Conditions.
|
|
|